Issue

Vol. 31 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Al-Qalam

Date Log

Submitted
Mar 11, 2025
Published
Jun 16, 2025

Copyright (c) 2025 Kamilatul farikhah, Ridwan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

ENGAGING NON-STATE ACTOR IN SECOND-TRACK DIPLOMACY: A STUDY OF NAHDLATUL ULAMA IN PROMOTING MODERATE ISLAM

https://doi.org/10.31969/alq.v31i1.1629
Ridwan Ridwan
Universitas lslam Internasional Indonesia (UIII), Depok, Indonesia., Indonesia
Kamilatul Farikhah
Universitas lslam Internasional Indonesia (UIII), Depok, Indonesia., Indonesia
Yusuf R Yanuri
University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom, United Kingdom

Corresponding Author(s) : Ridwan Ridwan

ridwan@uiii.ac.id

Al-Qalam, Vol. 31 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Al-Qalam

Abstract


Indonesia employs second-track diplomacy by engaging Islamic mass organizations as non-state actors and undertakes various forms of interfaith diplomacy to promote moderate Islam and achieve global peace. This article explains Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) 's efforts in promoting moderate Islam and addressing several global issues. The authors argue that Indonesia's collaboration with NU in the second-track diplomacy to project itself as a moderate Muslim country and utilize NU's influence to promote peace, tolerance, and interfaith dialogue globally. Hence, this partnership aims to enhance Indonesia's international reputation and address global challenges caused by religious and cultural misunderstandings. Overall, this article enriches the literature on Indonesia's global identity as a moderate Muslim nation shaped by the cooperation between the state and non-state actors.


Keywords

Diplomacy on the second track Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) Non-State Actor
References
  1. Abdik, Muhammad Asyrof. 2022. “Analisis Faith-Based Diplomacy Nahdlatul ‘Ulama Dalam Konflik Suku Di Afghanistan (2014-2019),” December. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/41813.
  2. Abdurahman, Febby Islami, Angga Nurdin Rachmat, and Tholhah Tholhah. 2024. “DIPLOMASI NAHDLATUL ULAMA (NU ) SEBAGAI NON STATE ACTORS DALAM UPAYA PERDAMAIAN KOFLIK AFGHANISTAN 2018.” Global Insights Journal : Jurnal Mahasiswa Hubungan Internasional 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.36859/gij.v1i1.2461.
  3. Afkar, Vyan Tashwirul, and Dwi Ardhanariswari Sundrijo. 2023. “Defining Islamic Transnationalism: A Case Study of Indonesia’s Nahdlatul Ulama.” Global Strategis 17 (2): 363–80. https://doi.org/10.20473/jgs.17.2.2023.363-380.
  4. Aprianto, Ary. 2020. “Sains sebagai Sumber Soft Power Indonesia [Science as a Source of Soft Power for Indonesia].” Jurnal Politica Dinamika Masalah Politik Dalam Negeri dan Hubungan Internasional 11 (1): 85–105. https://doi.org/10.22212/jp.v11i1.1444.
  5. Bandyopadhyay(Retd), Jayanta. 2015. “Book Review: Islam, Shafiqul and Susskind, Lawrence E. 2013: Water Diplomacy: A Negotiated Approach To Managing Complex Water Networks.” Progress in Development Studies 15 (1): 102–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993414547984.
  6. Basid, Abdul, Moh Fauzan, Amrulloh Amrulloh, Mujianto Solichin, Ahmad Munjin Nasih, and Bakri Mohamed Bkheet Ahmed. 2024. “The Role of Nahdlatul Ulama’ (NU) Diplomacy in Promoting Islam Rahmatan Lil ‘Alamin Exegesis to Strengthen Indonesian State-Religion Concepts: A Study of Gus Dur’s Thought.” Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 14 (2): 224–45. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc.142.14.
  7. Blakemore, Scott. 2019. “Faith-Based Diplomacy and Interfaith Dialogue,” May. https://doi.org/10.1163/24056006-12340010.
  8. Böhmelt, Tobias. 2010. “The Effectiveness of Tracks of Diplomacy Strategies in Third-Party Interventions.” Journal of Peace Research 47 (2): 167–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343309356488.
  9. Bronheim, Harold E. 1989. “Track II Diplomacy.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 37 (4): 1125–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/000306518903700414.
  10. Chaplin, Chris. 2017. “Book Review: Islam and Democracy in Indonesia: Tolerance Without Liberalism.” South East Asia Research 25 (3): 320–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967828X17725847.
  11. Dalacoura, Katerina. 2002. “Violence, September 11 and the Interpretations of Islam.” David Davies Memorial Institute 16 (2): 269–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117802016002008.
  12. Dallmayr, Fred. 2002. “Lessons of September 11,” Theory, Culture & Society, 19 (4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276402019004010.
  13. Edkins, Jenny. 2002. “Forget Trauma? Responses to September 11.” International Relations 16 (2): 243–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117802016002005.
  14. Fedele, Dante. 2018. “Religious Freedom and Diplomacy.” In The Encyclopedia of Diplomacy, edited by Gordon Martel, 1st ed., 1–13. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118885154.dipl0521.
  15. Feng, Huiyun. 2018. “Track 2 Diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific: Lessons for the Epistemic Community.” Asia Policy 13 (4): 60–66.
  16. Haddad, Simon, and Hilal Khashan. 2002. “Islam and Terrorism: Lebanese Muslim Views on September 11.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (6): 812–28.
  17. Hamid, Imron Rosyadi. 2017. “THE ROLE OF NON-STATE ACTORS IN COMBATING ISLAMIC RADICALISM: THE 2016 ISOMIL INITIATIVE BY NAHDLATUL ULAMA, INDONESIA.” Dialektika : Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Sosial 2 (2): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.36636/dialektika.v2i2.242.
  18. Hanan, Djayadi, Ridwan Ridwan, Sally Azaria, and Perwita Suci. 2024. “Bridging Peace and Interfaith Dialogue through Religion Twenty (R20) Forum in Indonesia 2022.” Religió Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama 14 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.15642/religio.v14i1.2579.
  19. Hannase, Mulawarman, Idil Hamzah, Akbar Akbar, and Mostafa Zahran. 2024. “NAHDLATUL ULAMAS CONCEPT OF PROMOTING GLOBAL HARMONY THROUGH RELIGION TWENTY.” Al-Qalam 30 (1): 187–99. https://doi.org/10.31969/alq.v30i1.1460.
  20. Harpviken, Kristian Berg, and Hanne Eggen Roislien. 2005. “Mapping the Terrain: The Role of Religion in Peacemaking.” July 2005. https://www.prio.org/publications/3255.
  21. Haryanto, Sri, and Robingun Suyud El Syam. 2023. “THE ROLE OF NAHDLATUL ULAMA IN CREATING AN R20 FORUM AS INDONESIA’S SOFT POWER IN THE WORLD.” Jurnal Scientia 12 (01): 968–76. https://doi.org/10.58471/scientia.v12i01.1321.
  22. Hasyim, Syafiq. 2015. “Majelis Ulama Indonesia and Pluralism in Indonesia.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 41 (4–5): 487–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453714566547.
  23. Haynes, Jeffrey. 2022. “International Relations, Religion, and Peace.” In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Religion and Peace, 473–84. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119424420.ch40.
  24. Hefner, Robert W. 2000. Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia. United States: Princeton Studies in Muslim Politics. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691050478/civil-islam.
  25. Herrington, Luke M., Alasdair McKay, and Jeffrey Haynes, eds. 2015. Nations under God: The Geopolitics of Faith in the Twenty-First Century. Bristol, England: E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/publication/nations-under-god-the-geopolitics-of-faith-in-the-twenty-first-century/.
  26. Heylen, Frederik, Bert Fraussen, and Jan Beyers. 2018. “Live to Fight Another Day? Organizational Maintenance and Mortality Anxiety of Civil Society Organizations.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 47 (6): 1249–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018788664.
  27. Hoesterey, James B. 2020. “Islamic Soft Power in the Age of Trump: Public Diplomacy and Indonesian Mosque Communities in America.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 31 (2): 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2020.1773617.
  28. Inboden, William. 2008. Religion and American Foreign Policy, 1945–1960: The Soul of Containment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499173.
  29. Kasmuri Selamat. 2023. “MODERATE ISLAM TO REDUCE CONFLICT AND MEDIATE PEACE IN THE MIDDLE EAST: A CASE OF NAHDLATUL ULAMA AND MUHAMMADIYAH.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 15 (1): 280–300. https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2023.4116.
  30. Kaya, Ayhan, and Amina Drhimeur. 2023. “Diaspora Politics and Religious Diplomacy in Turkey and Morocco.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 23 (2): 317–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2022.2095703.
  31. Kaye, Dalia Dassa. 2007. Talking to the Enemy: Track Two Diplomacy in the Middle East and South Asia. 1st ed. RAND Corporation. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg592nsrd.
  32. Khan, Issa, Mohammad Elius, Mohd Roslan Mohd Nor, Mohd Yakub zulkifli Bin Mohd yusoff, Kamaruzaman Noordin, and Fadillah Mansor. 2020. “A Critical Appraisal of Interreligious Dialogue in Islam.” SAGE Open 10 (4): 2158244020970560. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020970560.
  33. Kirby, Dianne. 2018. “The Roots of the Religious Cold War: Pre-Cold War Factors.” Social Sciences 7 (4): 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7040056.
  34. Loo, Sara, and A’an Suryana. 2024. Prospects and Challenges in Promoting Humanitarian Islam: Nahdlatul Ulama’s International Social Partnerships. ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1355/978981520392.
  35. Modongal, Shameer. 2023. “The Resurgence of Religion in International Relations: How Theories Can Accommodate It?” Cogent Social Sciences 9 (1): 2241265. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2241265.
  36. Muiz, Abdul. 2016. “Ini 15 Konsensus Hasil Konferensi Ulama Internasional Bela Negara.” NU Online. July 29, 2016. https://nu.or.id/nasional/ini-15-konsensus-hasil-konferensi-ulama-internasional-bela-negara-5Gp8j.
  37. Mustain, Akhmad. 2022. “Gus Yahya Agama Harus Jadi bagian Solusi Masalah-masalah Global.” July 9, 2022. https://mediaindonesia.com/humaniora/520782/gus-yahya-agama-harus-jadi-bagian-solusi-masalah-masalah-global.
  38. Nagarjun, Kumar. 2025. “RELIGION AS A DIPLOMATIC TOOL IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: A MULTIFACETED INFLUENCE.” The Social Science Review A Multidisciplinary Journal 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.70096/tssr.250301005.
  39. Neuman, William Lawrence. 2013. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Pearson Education.
  40. Niam, Mukafi. 2012. “Indonesia Tuan Rumah Pertemuan Sufi Internasional.” NU Online. November 16, 2012. https://www.nu.or.id/nasional/indonesia-tuan-rumah-pertemuan-sufi-internasional-aKDNd.
  41. Parker, Lyn, Chang-Yau Hoon, and Raihani. 2014. “Young People’s Attitudes towards Inter-Ethnic and Inter-Religious Socializing, Courtship and Marriage in Indonesia.” South East Asia Research 22 (4): 467–86. https://doi.org/10.5367/sear.2014.0230.
  42. Pratama, Emharis Gigih and Ferdiyan. 2021. “Religion and Public Diplomacy: The Role of Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) in Indonesia - Afghanistan Peace Agenda.” JURNAL PENELITIAN, July, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.28918/jupe.v18i1.3470.
  43. Purwono, Andi. 2020. “Diplomasi Kiai Nahdlatul ‘Ulama (NU) Melalui Konferensi Ulama Internasional.” SOSIO DIALEKTIKA 5 (2): 194–215. https://doi.org/10.31942/sd.v5i2.3875.
  44. Putra, Husni Amriyanto, Novi Rizka Amalia, and Sidiq Ahmadi. 2024. “Muhammadiyah and the Indonesian Government’s Peace Diplomacy toward the Rohingya Conflict.” SHS Web of Conferences 204:06001. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420406001.
  45. Ridwan. 2022. “R20, Upaya Melawan Politik Identitas Dunia Global.” SindoNews. Kamis, Oktober 2022. https://nasional.sindonews.com/read/924547/18/r20-upaya-melawan-politik-identitas-dunia-global-1666861828.
  46. Rohman, Abid. 2019. “Chinese–Indonesian Cultural and Religious Diplomacy,” May. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4891831.
  47. Ruiz Giménez, Esther. 2022. “Track II Diplomacy in Conflict Resolution : The Role of Religious Organisations as Mediating Powers.” https://repositorio.comillas.edu/xmlui/handle/11531/56840.
  48. Sachedina, Abdulaziz. 2001. The Islamic Roots of Democratic Pluralism. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
  49. Schirrmacher, Thomas, Wahidul Anam, Zainul Maarif, and Zezen Zaenal Mutaqin, eds. 2023. RELIGION TWENTY (R20): Moderatisme, Kemanusiaan Dan Perdamaian Global. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo. https://aswajapressindo.com/product/religion-twenty/.
  50. Staats, Jennifer. 2019. “A Primer on Multi-Track Diplomacy: How Does It Work?” United States Institute of Peace. July 31, 2019. https://www.usip.org/publications/2019/07/primer-multi-track-diplomacy-how-does-it-work.
  51. Sumarto, Sumarto. 2021. “IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM MODERASI BERAGAMA KEMENTERIAN AGAMA RI.” Jurnal Pendidikan Guru 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.47783/jurpendigu.v3i1.294.
  52. Syahnan, Mhd. 2019. “NAHDLATUL ULAMA SCHOLAR IN MANDAILING LAND: A Biography of Shaykh Ali Hasan Ahmad Ad-Dary.” Journal of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Societies 3 (1): 68. https://doi.org/10.30821/jcims.v3i1.4138.
  53. Taqwim, Farid. 2021. “Peran Nahdlatul Ulama Afghanistan Dalam Proses Perdamaian Di Afghanistan 2014-2020.” Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
  54. Thompson, Livingstone. 2015. “Religion and Diplomacy.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 10 (2): 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341306.
  55. Toft, Monica Duffy, Daniel Philpott, and Timothy Samuel Shah. 2011. God’s Century: Resurgent Religion and Global Politics. W. W. Norton.
  56. Utama, Virdika Rizky. 2024. “Nahdlatul Ulama’s Strategic Role in Shaping Indonesian Foreign Policy.” Muslim Politics Review 3 (2): 405–37. https://doi.org/10.56529/mpr.v3i2.312.
  57. Volkan, Vamik D. 1987. “Psychological Concepts Useful in the Building of Political Foundations between Nations: Track II Diplomacy.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 35 (4): 903–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/000306518703500406.
  58. Wahyu, Fitri Pebriani, and Ahmad Mufarih Hasan Fadly. 2023. “Divine Diplomacy: Religious Influence in Global Policymaking.” Religion and Policy Journal 1 (2): 47–53. https://doi.org/10.15575/rpj.v1i2.446.
  59. Werbner, Pnina. 2004. “The Predicament of Diaspora and Millennial Islam: Reflections on September 11, 2001.” Ethnicities 4 (4): 451–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796804047469.
  60. Zaduqisti, Esti, Ali Mashuri, Amat Zuhri, Tri Astutik Haryati, and Miftahul Ula. 2020. “On Being Moderate and Peaceful: Why Islamic Political Moderateness Promotes Outgroup Tolerance and Reconciliation.” Archive for the Psychology of Religion 42 (3): 359–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0084672420931204.
  61. Zellman, Ariel, and Davis Brown. 2022. “Uneasy Lies the Crown: External Threats to Religious Legitimacy and Putra, Husni Amriyanto, Novi Rizka Amalia, and Sidiq Ahmadi. 2024. “Muhammadiyah and the Indonesian Government’s Peace Diplomacy toward the Rohingya Conflict.” SHS Web of Conferences 204:06001. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420406001.
  62. Ridwan. 2022. “R20, Upaya Melawan Politik Identitas Dunia Global.” SindoNews. Kamis, Oktober 2022. https://nasional.sindonews.com/read/924547/18/r20-upaya-melawan-politik-identitas-dunia-global-1666861828.
  63. Rohman, Abid. 2019. “Chinese–Indonesian Cultural and Religious Diplomacy,” May. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4891831.
  64. Ruiz Giménez, Esther. 2022. “Track II Diplomacy in Conflict Resolution : The Role of Religious Organisations as Mediating Powers.” https://repositorio.comillas.edu/xmlui/handle/11531/56840.
  65. Sachedina, Abdulaziz. 2001. The Islamic Roots of Democratic Pluralism. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
  66. Schirrmacher, Thomas, Wahidul Anam, Zainul Maarif, and Zezen Zaenal Mutaqin, eds. 2023. RELIGION TWENTY (R20): Moderatisme, Kemanusiaan Dan Perdamaian Global. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo. https://aswajapressindo.com/product/religion-twenty/.
  67. Staats, Jennifer. 2019. “A Primer on Multi-Track Diplomacy: How Does It Work?” United States Institute of Peace. July 31, 2019. https://www.usip.org/publications/2019/07/primer-multi-track-diplomacy-how-does-it-work.
  68. Sumarto, Sumarto. 2021. “IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM MODERASI BERAGAMA KEMENTERIAN AGAMA RI.” Jurnal Pendidikan Guru 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.47783/jurpendigu.v3i1.294.
  69. Syahnan, Mhd. 2019. “NAHDLATUL ULAMA SCHOLAR IN MANDAILING LAND: A Biography of Shaykh Ali Hasan Ahmad Ad-Dary.” Journal of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Societies 3 (1): 68. https://doi.org/10.30821/jcims.v3i1.4138.
  70. Taqwim, Farid. 2021. “Peran Nahdlatul Ulama Afghanistan Dalam Proses Perdamaian Di Afghanistan 2014-2020.” Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
  71. Thompson, Livingstone. 2015. “Religion and Diplomacy.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 10 (2): 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341306.
  72. Toft, Monica Duffy, Daniel Philpott, and Timothy Samuel Shah. 2011. God’s Century: Resurgent Religion and Global Politics. W. W. Norton.
  73. Utama, Virdika Rizky. 2024. “Nahdlatul Ulama’s Strategic Role in Shaping Indonesian Foreign Policy.” Muslim Politics Review 3 (2): 405–37. https://doi.org/10.56529/mpr.v3i2.312.
  74. Volkan, Vamik D. 1987. “Psychological Concepts Useful in the Building of Political Foundations between Nations: Track II Diplomacy.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 35 (4): 903–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/000306518703500406.
  75. Wahyu, Fitri Pebriani, and Ahmad Mufarih Hasan Fadly. 2023. “Divine Diplomacy: Religious Influence in Global Policymaking.” Religion and Policy Journal 1 (2): 47–53. https://doi.org/10.15575/rpj.v1i2.446.
  76. Werbner, Pnina. 2004. “The Predicament of Diaspora and Millennial Islam: Reflections on September 11, 2001.” Ethnicities 4 (4): 451–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796804047469.
  77. Zaduqisti, Esti, Ali Mashuri, Amat Zuhri, Tri Astutik Haryati, and Miftahul Ula. 2020. “On Being Moderate and Peaceful: Why Islamic Political Moderateness Promotes Outgroup Tolerance and Reconciliation.” Archive for the Psychology of Religion 42 (3): 359–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0084672420931204.
  78. Zellman, Ariel, and Davis Brown. 2022. “Uneasy Lies the Crown: External Threats to Religious Legitimacy andPutra, Husni Amriyanto, Novi Rizka Amalia, and Sidiq Ahmadi. 2024. “Muhammadiyah and the Indonesian Government’s Peace Diplomacy toward the Rohingya Conflict.” SHS Web of Conferences 204:06001. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202420406001.
  79. Ridwan. 2022. “R20, Upaya Melawan Politik Identitas Dunia Global.” SindoNews. Kamis, Oktober 2022. https://nasional.sindonews.com/read/924547/18/r20-upaya-melawan-politik-identitas-dunia-global-1666861828.
  80. Rohman, Abid. 2019. “Chinese–Indonesian Cultural and Religious Diplomacy,” May. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4891831.
  81. Ruiz Giménez, Esther. 2022. “Track II Diplomacy in Conflict Resolution : The Role of Religious Organisations as Mediating Powers.” https://repositorio.comillas.edu/xmlui/handle/11531/56840.
  82. Sachedina, Abdulaziz. 2001. The Islamic Roots of Democratic Pluralism. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
  83. Schirrmacher, Thomas, Wahidul Anam, Zainul Maarif, and Zezen Zaenal Mutaqin, eds. 2023. RELIGION TWENTY (R20): Moderatisme, Kemanusiaan Dan Perdamaian Global. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo. https://aswajapressindo.com/product/religion-twenty/.
  84. Staats, Jennifer. 2019. “A Primer on Multi-Track Diplomacy: How Does It Work?” United States Institute of Peace. July 31, 2019. https://www.usip.org/publications/2019/07/primer-multi-track-diplomacy-how-does-it-work.
  85. Sumarto, Sumarto. 2021. “IMPLEMENTASI PROGRAM MODERASI BERAGAMA KEMENTERIAN AGAMA RI.” Jurnal Pendidikan Guru 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.47783/jurpendigu.v3i1.294.
  86. Syahnan, Mhd. 2019. “NAHDLATUL ULAMA SCHOLAR IN MANDAILING LAND: A Biography of Shaykh Ali Hasan Ahmad Ad-Dary.” Journal of Contemporary Islam and Muslim Societies 3 (1): 68. https://doi.org/10.30821/jcims.v3i1.4138.
  87. Taqwim, Farid. 2021. “Peran Nahdlatul Ulama Afghanistan Dalam Proses Perdamaian Di Afghanistan 2014-2020.” Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
  88. Thompson, Livingstone. 2015. “Religion and Diplomacy.” The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 10 (2): 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341306.
  89. Toft, Monica Duffy, Daniel Philpott, and Timothy Samuel Shah. 2011. God’s Century: Resurgent Religion and Global Politics. W. W. Norton.
  90. Utama, Virdika Rizky. 2024. “Nahdlatul Ulama’s Strategic Role in Shaping Indonesian Foreign Policy.” Muslim Politics Review 3 (2): 405–37. https://doi.org/10.56529/mpr.v3i2.312.
  91. Volkan, Vamik D. 1987. “Psychological Concepts Useful in the Building of Political Foundations between Nations: Track II Diplomacy.” Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association 35 (4): 903–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/000306518703500406.
  92. Wahyu, Fitri Pebriani, and Ahmad Mufarih Hasan Fadly. 2023. “Divine Diplomacy: Religious Influence in Global Policymaking.” Religion and Policy Journal 1 (2): 47–53. https://doi.org/10.15575/rpj.v1i2.446.
  93. Werbner, Pnina. 2004. “The Predicament of Diaspora and Millennial Islam: Reflections on September 11, 2001.” Ethnicities 4 (4): 451–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796804047469.
  94. Zaduqisti, Esti, Ali Mashuri, Amat Zuhri, Tri Astutik Haryati, and Miftahul Ula. 2020. “On Being Moderate and Peaceful: Why Islamic Political Moderateness Promotes Outgroup Tolerance and Reconciliation.” Archive for the Psychology of Religion 42 (3): 359–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0084672420931204.
  95. Zellman, Ariel, and Davis Brown. 2022. “Uneasy Lies the Crown: External Threats to Religious Legitimacy and Interstate Dispute Militarization.” Security Studies 31 (1): 152–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2022.2038664.
  96. Zidni, E. Ervi Siti Zahroh. 2023. “Analisis Konsistensi Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) Mendorong Kemerdekaan Palestina.” ISLAM NUSANTARA:Journal for the Study of Islamic History and Culture 4 (1): 55–81. https://doi.org/10.47776/islamnusantara.v4i1.681.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 588