Issue

Vol. 28 No. 2 (2022)

Date Log

Submitted
Aug 25, 2022
Published
Nov 2, 2022

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

ANALYSIS OF JUDGES' DECISIONS REGARDING DIVORCE CASES WITH DIGITAL EVIDENCE IN THE SAMARINDA RELIGIOUS COURT

https://doi.org/10.31969/alq.v28i2.1146
Delvina Tri Agustin
UINSI SAMARINDA, Indonesia
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6133-6646
Bambang Iswanto
UINSI SAMARINDA, Indonesia
Nur Syamsi
UINSI SAMARINDA, Indonesia

Corresponding Author(s) : Delvina Tri Agustin

delvinatri@gmail.com

Al-Qalam, Vol. 28 No. 2 (2022)

Abstract

The legal force of digital evidence submitted by litigants in divorce hearings in religious courts is the background for this research. The method used in this study is normative legal research with a normative analytical juridical approach to judges' decisions in divorce cases as the object of research. So that researchers can answer problems by conducting literature research from relevant legal sources.The judge's consideration in deciding the case is in the law relating to Marriage, the stages of the trial procedure, the legal basis of the case, the legal basis for evidence, the legal basis for the reason or cause of divorce, and the legal basis for the authority of the judge. Meanwhile, the position of digital evidence itself as one of the evidence of confessions that is stamped and used by the judge as the main case for the cause of divorce.The judge did not use Law No. 11 of 2008 on electronic information on digital evidence but focused on Jurisprudence which gave birth to rules on the examination of divorce on the grounds of Article 19 letter (f) of Government Regulation No. 9 of 1975 jo Article 116 of the Compilation of Islamic Law, where the doctrine that must be applied in divorce cases is not "Matri Monial Guilt" but "Broken Marriage" or precisely the outbreak of the household "Az-Zawwaj Al-Maksuroh"  so that the court does not focus on whose faults are the triggers for the dispute, but emphasizes the condition of the household itself.

Keywords

Divorce evidence Islamic Law
References
  1. Undang-Undang Perkawinan, Pub. L. No. No.1 (1974).
  2. Agama, P. (2017). Putusan Pengadilan Agama Samarinda (Patent No. 1761/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Smd).
  3. Al-Khauli, M. S. (2016). Ensiklopedi Fikih Wanita. Jakarta: Pustaka Imam Asy-Syafi‟ i.
  4. Anas, S. (2002). Pengantar Statistic Pendidikan: Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.
  5. Ayyub, S. H. (2006). Fikih Keluarga cet. I. Jakarta: Pustaka Al-Kausar.
  6. Cahyadri, S. H. R. A. (2021). Apa Yang Harus Ditanyakan Kepada Ahli Digital Forensics?(Panduan Bagi Praktisi Hukum). books.google.com. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en%5C&lr=%5C&id=bXskEAAAQBAJ%5C&oi=fnd%5C&pg=PP1%5C&dq=apa+yang+harus+ditanyakan+kepada+ahli+digital+forenics%5C&ots=er4aN5x8Aw%5C&sig=s8zxYUpeEFpGjwrrtx-QaAK9bSE
  7. Eddy Armi. (2020). Bukti Elektronik dalam Praktik Peradilan,. Sinar Grafika.
  8. Emzir, M., & Pd, M. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Analisis data. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.
  9. Fauzan, H. M., & SH, M. M. (2016). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama dan Mahkamah Syar’iah di Indonesia. books.google.com. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en%5C&lr=%5C&id=qTi2DwAAQBAJ%5C&oi=fnd%5C&pg=PR1%5C&dq=%22pokok+pokok%22+hukum+acara+perdata+peradilan+agama+dan+mahkamah+%22syar+iyah%22+di+indonesia%5C&ots=jdqMC9PFrX%5C&sig=t_VO71hUeQziq2Y4SrbkV0EyjHQ
  10. Fuadah, A T. (2019). Huku Acara Peradilan Agama Plus Prinsip Hukum Acara Islam Dalam Risalah Qadhafi Umar Bin Khatab. Depok: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
  11. Fuadah, A Tsamrotul. (2019). Hukum acara peradilan agama plus prinsip hukum acara Islam dalam risalah Qadha Umar Bin Khattab. digilib.uinsgd.ac.id. https://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/38782/
  12. Ghazaly, H. A. R. (2019). Fiqh munakahat. books.google.com. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en%5C&lr=%5C&id=hkC2DwAAQBAJ%5C&oi=fnd%5C&pg=PA212%5C&dq=fiqh+munakahat%5C&ots=uxlhIix6mC%5C&sig=zp6jaubs96uSRWJatdhbxftmM30
  13. Grotto, M. (2010). Council of Europe Convention on cyber crime and its ratification in the Italian legal system. Sistema Penal & Violência. http://www.studiolegalefuringrotto.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/08-Grotto-Convention-on-Cybercrime.pdf
  14. Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Sosial Media. Business Horizons.
  15. Hajar, S. (2018). Gugatan Perceraian Dikarenakan Perselingkuhan Di Media Sosial Menurut Hukum Islam (Studi Putusan: 1979/Pdt. G/2017/PA. Mdn). repositori.usu.ac.id. https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/11112
  16. Harahap, M. Y. (2009). Kedudukan, Kewenangan, dan Acara Peradilan Agama, Cet. Ke-5. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
  17. Izza, Z. R., & Huda, M. (2022). Dampak Media Sosial bagi Kehidupan Perkawinan di Ponorogo. Journal of Economics, Law, and …. https://ejournal.iainponorogo.ac.id/index.php/jelhum/article/view/528
  18. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia, (2008).
  19. lexi j moleong. (2007). metode penelitian kualitatif.
  20. Manan, A. (2013). Penemuan Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Praktek Hukum Acara Di Peradilan Agama. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan. https://www.jurnalhukumdanperadilan.org/index.php/jurnalhukumperadilan/article/view/113
  21. Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Penelitian Hukum, Edisi Revisi, Cetakan Ke-12. Jakarta: Kencana.
  22. Mertokusumo, S. (2013). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia Edisi Revisi. Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Yogyakarta.
  23. Muhammad, A. (2004). Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004). Abdulkadir Muhammad.
  24. Musthafa Dib Al-Bugha. (2018). Fikih Islam Lengkap Penjelasan Hukum-hukum Islam, Mazhab Syafi’I. Solo:Media Zikir, 379.
  25. Pasek, D. (2016). Metodologi penelitian hukum normatif dalam justifikasi teori hukum. Jakarta: PrenadaMedia Grup.
  26. Rasyid, L. M. (2015). Herinawati, Pengantar Hukum Acara Perdata. Cet. I, Unimal Press, Sulawesi.
  27. concerning Religious Courts, Pub. L. No. 18 (1989).
  28. Rubini, I., & Ali, C. (1974). Pengantar hukum acara perdata. Alumni.
  29. Satiadarma, M. P. (2001). Menyikapi perselingkuhan. Jakarta: Pustaka Populer Obor.
  30. Sidharta, B. A. (2007). Meuwissen tentang pengembangan hukum, ilmu hukum, teori hukum, dan filsafat hukum. library.stik-ptik.ac.id. http://library.stik-ptik.ac.id/detail?id=27791%5C&lokasi=lokal
  31. Sudirman, L. (2021). Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama. books.google.com. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en%5C&lr=%5C&id=Yh0zEAAAQBAJ%5C&oi=fnd%5C&pg=PA169%5C&dq=hukum+acara+peradilan+agama%5C&ots=wqx5jTO9-f%5C&sig=6xZ8t1ksujMDMG6_0Sxlp486b1s
  32. Sumardjono, M. S. W. (2005). Pedoman Pembuatan Usulan Penelitian, Sebuah Panduan Dasar, Penerbit PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
  33. Supramono, G. (1993). Hukum Pembuktian di Peradilan Agama. PT. ALUMNI.
  34. Syaikh, M. A. bin A. (2008). Tafsir Ibnu Katsir. In Pustaka Imam Asy-Syafi’I (p. 617).
  35. Ulfa, M. (2019). Analisis Hukum Islam terhadap Penggunaan Media Sosial sebagai Penyebab Perceraian (Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Agama Sungguminasa Kelas IB Tahun 2016 …. repositori.uin-alauddin.ac.id. https://repositori.uin-alauddin.ac.id/14644/
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 475